The Complete Guide to Co-Processing

Unfortunately, not everything can be recycled or turned into new products — but alternative and sustainable waste management practices do exist.  

Co-processing is a procedure that utilizes waste materials and turns them into energy instead of sending them to landfills or incineration. 

One key material used in this process is non-recyclable plastic, meaning co-processing can help combat excessive plastic pollution already impacting our planet. 

Co-processing is carried out in industrial settings and has grown in popularity, as the world explores how to deal with increasing levels of waste. But is this the answer to our world’s waste problem? Here’s what you need to know. 

Want your business to work towards a circular economy? Connect with our experts to assess your packaging and learn which steps your brand can take to achieve this goal. 

What’s on this page?

01 | What is co-processing? 
02 | How is co-processing used in the cement industry?
03 | Is co-processing environmentally friendly?
04 | Pros and cons of co-processing
05 | Which countries use co-processing the most? 
06 | FAQs

What is co-processing? 

Co-processing is a waste management method that uses combustion to transform waste products into fuel and raw materials. This helps conserve energy and resources elsewhere in material production, reducing industrial reliance on raw and virgin materials that are currently depleting at an unsustainable rate. 

In the co-processing space, waste products are seen as a resource instead of something to be discarded, which supports a circular economy. Instead of polluting our environment or sending them to landfills, they're given a different purpose. 

The practice is particularly popular in cement manufacturing, the world’s most widely used man-made building material. In the European cement industry, 48% of fuel comes from alternative sources, saving 21 million tonnes of CO2 from being emitted into our atmosphere annually. While the cement industry is the current leader, other sectors using kilns could do the same. 

The cement industry reportedly needs around 1,600kg of raw material and 200kg of coal to make 1 ton of clinker, the main ingredient in cement. However, co-processing decreases the reliance on both these resources. 

The most interesting thing about co-processing is its connection to waste. 

Our world’s existing waste management and recycling practices are unfortunately falling short. More than three-quarters of waste that ends up in landfills could have been recycled, and even biodegradable materials like food release massive methane emissions when sent to landfills. 

Even waste destined for recycling sometimes goes to waste. According to the OECD, just 9% of plastic waste gets recycled, highlighting massive inefficiencies in existing practices. 

Co-processing offers an alternative solution for waste plastic that’s been contaminated or mixed with other materials. 

The process can use various waste products, which can dramatically reduce the amount of trash gathered in landfills worldwide. This includes household municipal solid waste (MSW) like plastic, paper, and textiles and industrial waste like scrap tires, biomass, and concrete rubble. 

How does it work?

Co-processing requires many complex steps and industrial machinery to achieve the desired results. Some practices may vary, depending on the type of waste they use and their location, but here are the simplified steps: 

1. Preparation: The waste is prepared for co-processing through sorting processes, which ensure that non-combustible or hazardous materials are removed from the mix.
2. Combustion: The waste is then put through a cement kiln, which exposes the materials to super-high heat of around 1,450°C (2,642°F). This causes the waste to combust and release energy, leading to the creation of ‘alternative fuels and raw materials’ (AFR). During this phase, the waste is completely destroyed. 
3. Energy recovery: The heat generated through this process replaces fossil fuels in cement production.
4. Material recovery: Minerals and leftover ash from the combusted waste residue are used as raw material to make clinker. 

What’s the difference between co-processing and incineration?

It’s easy to mistake co-processing and incineration for the same thing because they both burn waste in high-heat machines. 

However, the similarities end there. Incineration and co-processing are different because of their outcomes. 

The main goal of incineration is to eradicate the volume of waste products by burning them into ash without really considering sustainability. The practice isn’t good for the planet because it produces considerable toxic fumes that fuel climate change and pose health challenges. What’s more, the incinerated waste will still be deposited in landfills. 

Co-processing is considered more sustainable because it ensures that waste is used for another purpose. During co-processing, waste generates heat and minerals that benefit industrial practices. When products are completely burned up, the byproducts are re-used in cement mixtures. 

Although co-processing does release emissions, cement kilns also use flue gas cleaning systems that help to capture harmful particles and components, preventing them from being released into the environment. 

How is co-processing used in the cement industry?

Co-processing generates the energy needed to manufacture cement products, helping cement companies reduce fossil fuel use while cutting costs. 

The residue is then used to make clinker (an ingredient typically made from limestone and clay), further reducing the need for investments in raw materials. By supporting a circular economy through co-processing, the cement industry can benefit from improved resource management and reduced fossil fuel emissions. 

Like other industries, the global cement market is being called upon to adopt more sustainable practices, so co-processing also benefits the industry as we look toward a greener future. 

Evidently, the use of co-processing in the cement market is already growing. According to Cembureau, the European Cement Association, some cement plants in Germany and Austria already use 100% alternative fuels and 12% alternative raw materials in their manufacturing. 

The European Cement Association predicted this trend will continue to grow. By 2030, the organization expects around 60% of the cement industry's energy to come from co-processing and alternative fuels, and by 2050, the sector could be net-zero. 

The cement industry is also well positioned to prepare for further regulatory requirements that may evolve as governments look for sustainable ways to future-proof business. Cement plants that focus on co-processing can similarly earn a competitive edge as governments seek partners that can help tackle the world’s mounting waste problem. 

Is co-processing environmentally friendly?

Co-processing is indeed marketed as a sustainable solution for recycling and waste management. The industry does have the potential to help clean up mountains of waste gathered in overflowing landfills and other waste destined for our rivers and oceans. 

So far, it’s also one of the most scalable solutions to non-recyclable waste. As a result, developments surrounding co-processing are likely to continue expanding. 

At the same time, co-processing shouldn’t be seen as the only solution to our planet’s waste problem. Some products, such as batteries and medical waste, cannot be processed because they are hazardous. Similarly, PVC and plastics containing halogens must be removed during the sorting phase as they release harmful chemicals when incinerated. 

In addition to limitations in the co-processing product types, it’s also not entirely emission-free. Carbon emissions are released from waste transport to combustion and shouldn’t be touted as completely environmentally friendly. Reports have highlighted concerns about the release of harmful furan and dioxin toxins if kilns aren’t optimized properly. 

While cement manufacturers must adhere to emissions regulations, there’s little public information about the amount of emissions actually linked to co-processing. A blog called Down to Earth also suggested there is a “veil of secrecy” about co-processing data. 

While co-processing may help us combat waste, we need to focus on stopping plastic manufacturing at its source and preventing the production of more waste. 

Pros and cons of co-processing

It's important to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of co-processing to understand its potential future impact on our world. 

Pros

• A chance to combat non-recyclable waste: According to the UNEP, 100 million metric tons of plastic from short-lived products will need a disposal solution by 2040. Co-processing could be the answer for some of these waste items, as it destroys durable plastics while reaping benefits from the process. 
• Potentially more environmentally friendly: Co-processing reduces waste, requires less reliance on fossil fuels, and promotes a circular economy, suggesting it’s more beneficial for the environment than alternative practices like incineration.
• Cost benefits: A Geocycle report claimed that up to €15.6 billion typically spent on waste management buildings and infrastructure could be saved if we invest more in co-processing. There are also considerable cost savings from replacing fossil fuels with waste combustion and long-term financial benefits of supporting a more sustainable planet. Plastic credit systems could also be used in the future to incentivize co-processing practices further. 
• Opportunity to scale: Many solutions to traditionally non-recyclable plastics are relatively small-scale, but co-processing is a scalable option because most countries have cement kilns. The Geocycle report also referred to a study that suggested there’s little stopping co-processing from expanding, claiming “there is no technical limitation at the cement plants to increase the share of alternative fuels from 36% now to 95% EU-wide.”

Cons

• Not everything can be co-processed: Co-processing cannot process batteries and certain plastics, as they release harmful toxins during combustion. This suggests that any failures in the sorting process pose health risks if the products are burned. Scaling up such practices adds to the risk of this happening. It would be wrong to say co-processing is a solution to the world’s waste because it ultimately only masks the problem of excessive waste production. 
• Uncertainty around emissions data: There is little public, independent, and up-to-date information about the co-processing industry. This makes it difficult to determine exactly what emissions are released during this process or whether they pose any health risks. One 2023 study noted the unintentional release of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans from cement kilns that burn waste; however, the researchers added that more investigations were needed. 
• Depends on cement demand: This industry's profitability and expansion ultimately depend on the cement products market. A decline here is unlikely, but it’s worth pointing out that this waste management method depends on another industry's success — which comes with risk. 

Which countries use co-processing the most? 

Co-processing is promising, but factors like regulation and existing waste-management infrastructures influence a country’s ability to tackle waste using this method. 

Reports show that several European countries are interested in developing co-processing systems. Data from the European Union shows that those rates between member states vary from 7% to 95%. Geocycle, a company that focuses on coprocessing, claims to have 86 locations in Europe and others in the Americas and the Middle East. 

The potential of future co-processing hotspots around our world will also depend on a country’s cement industry. According to World Population Review, China currently produces the most cement in the world, and a 2021 study concluded that: “With the modernization and development of China's cement industry, most cement production lines have the technical conditions and production scale for co-processing of municipal solid waste (MWS).”

Summary

Co-processing isn’t necessarily a new concept, but it’s now gathering ground because more people are paying attention to the planet’s monumental waste problem. 

The industry is showing promise, and there is a lot of room for further innovation and development in this sphere. 

While co-processing can help with waste, it’s not a silver bullet for our planet’s plastic problem. 

However, it shows that innovative solutions are constantly emerging, giving us hope for solving our planet’s waste crisis. 

At CleanHub, we’re committed to helping brands improve their environmental impact and work toward a more circular economy. Want to get involved? Get in touch with our experts today to learn about how you can reduce your business’s plastic footprint.

FAQs

What is the co-processing method?

Co-processing relies on waste combustion to generate energy and raw materials in industry. This practice is considered sustainable as it helps eradicate waste while serving as a replacement for fossil fuels. 

What is an example of co-processing?

The most common example of co-processing happens in the cement industry. Here, cement manufacturers burn waste products in a cement kiln, generating heat that helps manufacture the cement. The ash byproduct of co-processing is used to make clinker, which is also used to make cement. 

What is the meaning of something being co-processed?

When something is co-processed, it results from a process that uses waste to generate energy and raw materials. It’s seen as an effective way to address climate change as it uses materials that would have otherwise gone to landfills while reducing the combustion of fossil fuels.